Delivered One Month Before The Deadlineâ€Free samples for Students

Questions: What's going on? What are the facts? What are the issues(non-ethical)? Who is affected? What are the ethical issues and their implications? What can be done about it? What are the options? Which option is the best and why? Answers: 1.The program director of an organization got a call from the CIA of the company that the Willis project have to be delivered one month before the deadline. This has created the scenario worse. The project manager was asked to complete this with his team. The project is to be delivered without encryption. The project manager told the program director about the consequences of without encryption of the project ("Scenario 3: Early Launch", 2017). The hacking of the data and information is worst case for the scenario. The program director tried to convince the project manager by providing extra bonuses for his team members. But there is a huge risk of completing the Willis project one month earlier than the deadline. 2.The case study focuses on the conversation of the program director and project manager regarding the completion of the Willis project. The CIA asked for the delivery one month earlier even without the encrypting the project. This has caused a problem for the company, as it is risky for being hacked. The company has offered to sign a contract if the delivery is one month earlier the deadline. Therefore, the program director is excited for going for the opportunity in the future. 3.The unethical issues are related with the behavior of the program director with the project manager in the company. The opportunity of getting a contract worth 3 million is depended in the delivery of the Willis project one month earlier than deadline (Mannay Morgan, 2015). Therefore, the program director is looking for the contract by forgetting the consequences. The company might lose their image if the data is hacked during delivery. These unethical issues are prevailing in the company. 4.The program managers and program director are affected by this case study. The team members are pressurized to complete the project before the deadline. The project manager of the team has to management his team and motivate them to maintain the decency in the team (Black, 2013). The CIA of the company is affected to complete the project within the specified time. The team members are affected, as they have to increase their speed of the work to complete the project. 5.The ethical issues are depended on the decisions of the program director of sending the project without encrypting the project. The risks of data breach have been prevailing in the delivery of the project (Gray, 2016). The cyber attack is a common problem in the worker of the IT and loss in data and information. These are the main ethical problems of the company. The project manager and the CIA have decided to replace the program director from the company. The company has gone in loss due to the breach in the data and information in the market. 6.The different techniques are followed in order to maintain the issues in the cyber company. The project has been hacked by the hacked of the data has been breached out in the market. The company has diminished the project in order to maintain the image of the company in the market. The project has been hacked and the data is breached out. Another condition is that the project is rebuilt with new deadline and it is success (Coghlan Brannick, 2014). The project manager and the senior developer have convinced the program director to stop the project and rebuilt it with new deadline. Therefore, the project has been diminished and the company has been running in loss. The reputation of the company has gone down in the market. The manager and CIA have decided to remove the program director for maintaining the image of the company in the market. 7.There are different options that might helps in maintaining the proper solutions to the scenario. The project manager has convinced the program director to understand the consequences of without encryption and chances of hacking if the data and information. The project has been hacked in the internet and the data has been breached out in the market (Mintz, 2016). The company is running in loss and there is degradation in the image of the company in the marketing. The project manager and senior developer have able to convince the program director to stop the project. They have also replaced the program director from the company has been reframed and he project is restarted from the beginning with new deadline. The deadline of the project has been fixed and the company has delivered the project on time. 8.This scenario has been maintained by the company to complete the project before one month of the deadline scheduled. These also helped in maintaining the brand image of the company in the market. The project manager and the senior developer try to convince the program director for educating him the consequences of the hacking and without encrypting the project. Therefore, the best option is to convince the program director regarding it. Therefore, the program manager was convinced with the program manager and senior developer and decided to not accepting the requirement of the CIA of the company regarding early delivery of the project. References Bell, J. (2014).Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Black, J. (2013).Mixed news: The public/civic/communitarian journalism debate. Routledge. Coghlan, D., Brannick, T. (2014).Doing action research in your own organization. Sage. Gray, D. E. (2016).Doing Research in the Business World. SAGE. Mannay, D., Morgan, M. (2015). Doing ethnography or applying a qualitative technique? Reflections from the waiting field.Qualitative Research,15(2), 166-182. Miguel, A. (2014).Doing Christian Ethics from the Margins: Revised and Expanded. Orbis Books. Mintz, S. (2016). Giving voice to values: A new approach to accounting ethics education.Global Perspectives on Accounting Education,13, 37-50. Scenario 3: Early Launch. (2017). YouTube. Retrieved 7 August 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5M7ohdZ6qA